Categories
- Blogs
- Books
- Bulleted lists
- Chat
- Collaborating
- Content
- Contest
- Credibility
- Customer satisfaction survey
- Customer service
- Customer service e-mail
- Editing
- enewsletter
- English as a second language
- FAQs
- Government web writing
- Grammar and usage
- Help desk
- Hypertext links
- Jargon
- Jobs
- Marketing
- Metrics
- Plain language
- Press release
- Public relations
- Punctuation
- Quality standards
- Research
- Social Customer Service
- Social media
- Spelling
- Style guides
- Subject line
- Tone
- Usability
- Usage
- Visual display
- Webinar
- Web Writing
- Wikis
- Word cloud
- Words
- Writing
- Writing resources
- Writing Skills
- Writing training
August 29, 2010
For Double the Value, Cut Your Web Content In Half
Sometimes the best solution to a problem is the simplest one. Overweight? Eat less. Low on funds? Sell the flowery china you inherited from your great aunt.
Flabby, non-engaging web content? Cut it in half. Sometimes the best thing you can do to your web content is just make it shorter by half.
My experiment: halve the word count at consulting company's web page
Through a random Google search, I found Blue Jay Consulting's "Approach"
page and decided to use it test my edit-with-machete technique. (Full disclosure: I don't know anyone at Blue Jay Consulting or anything about the company; I'm not a hater or a fan.) Here's the original content at 153 words:
Approach
Our goal is to optimize the performance of every organization with which we work. We figure out how to maximize the capability of systems and personnel alike. Our techniques are proven, our consultants are respected and our clients benefit from quantifiable results.
We base all of our efforts on the following general approach:
- Conduct a thorough assessment of the department. What's not working, what's not making sense? Where are the problems, where are the opportunities?
- Dive into day-to-day operations to gain insight into your organization's performance.
- Present a set of recommendations for department-wide improvements.
- Partner with personnel from all areas of the hospital -- including administration, physicians and front-line staff -- in problem-solving efforts.
- Remain in place during the implementation of new process and system improvements in order to manage the change and provide support.
- Maintain ongoing contact with clients to ensure sustainability of achieved successes.
My 50-percent-shorter version (76 words)
Approach
We improve your organization’s performance by maximizing the capabilities
of your systems and personnel. Our consultants employ our proven six-step approach to gain you quantifiable results:
- Assess the department to discover problems and opportunities.
- Analyze day-to-day operations to understand the department’s performance.
- Recommend improvements.
- Partner with administration, physicians, and front-line staff to solve problems.
- Provide support while you implement new processes.
- Maintain contact so you can sustain your successes.
What I learned from my cut-content-by-half experiment
- This was hard work, which I couldn't accomplish in one sitting. I had to do this word whittling in several rounds.
- I may have inadvertently altered the meaning of this content, so if you're cutting your own content by half, be careful.
- Shorter isn't always better. I kind of liked the original sentence "Our techniques are proven, our consultants are respected and our clients benefit from quantifiable results." My version is shorter, but it doesn't have the rhythm of the original: "Our consultants employ our proven six-step approach to gain you quantifiable results..."
Are you game? Try this 50-percent-less experiment on your content and let me know whether the task was difficult and whether you like the shorter version. If you'd like, we'll link to your new, streamlined content here (especially if you'll show us the longer version too).
-- Leslie O'Flahavan
Comments
Thanks for your comments, David. I love your cut-by-half rewrite and I hate that it's better than mine! Your version has more life and energy. I think I got a little blinded by the challenge.
Posted by: Leslie O'Flahavan | August 29, 2010 at 11:17:20am
Leslie I have been doing this cut and rewrite for 20 years and I am generally satisfied with cutting 30%. Cheryl
Posted by: Cheryl Stephens | August 29, 2010 at 02:49:56pm
It's always easier to bat clean-up! My action verb for each bullet format has the disadvantage that I can't do something as wonderful as your "3. Recommend improvements." Of course, clear writing is only as good as the thoughts it is expressing. As someone who is rethinking our offerings, value proposition, and messaging for the first time since 2006 or so, I can tell you that even EWRITE's rewrite of my old website wouldn't be very good -- we just didn't have that stuff figured out then. Ideally, if Blue Jay sees your crisp rewrite, they'll think, "wow, these points aren't nearly as important as these other ones," and the improvement will continue. @Cheryl - I agree 30% is a wonderful place to land. But isn't Leslie's Big Hairy Audacious Goal an exciting place to start?
Posted by: David Kay | August 29, 2010 at 11:29:34pm
Add your comment
Get email updates
Recent posts
- Why a 280-Character Customer Service Tweet is a Bad Idea
- How to Use LinkedIn to Your Best Advantage
- In live chat, don’t argue with customers who are trying to pay
- Writing for the Web: Register for this course on March 15, 2013 in Silver Spring,MD
- Using Twitter for Customer Service? Answer the customer’s dang question
Blogroll
- 456 Berea St
- Bad Language
- Beth Kanter's Blog
- Business Writing
- Communication in a Web Saturated World
- Compete on Usability
- copyblogger
- Debbie Weil
- Earley Blog
- Good Experience
- Grammar Girl :: Quick and Dirty Tips
- I'd Rather Be Writing
- In the Box
- Klariti.com
- Learn How to Write from the Best Blogs
- Manage Your Writing
- Plain Language Matters
- The Writer Underground
- Webcredible
- Words to Good Effect
- Writing for the Web
- Wylie's Writing Tips
- Your English Success
Archive
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008




"If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." (Attributed to, well, just about everyone: Twain, Proust, Eliot, Jefferson, Pascal...) I appreciate your taking on examples, rather than just giving advice. And isn't it easier to edit someone else's copy than our own? Here's my cut at it. It's not quite half, depending on how you count, but it preserves (exposes?) a little of the music. Some word choices are idiosyncratic--I like "ground truth," but I have an intelligence community background, and that may not resonate with everyone. If I had to cut further, I'd start losing steps. Five points would be better than six, anyhow, in the marketing conventional wisdom.
Posted by: David Kay | August 29, 2010 at 10:38:51am